1. This image is called "Blue Crucifixion" by Kazuya Akimoto, a Japanese artist. This contemporary abstract representation of the cross is a pastel on paper. It was made in 2003. Akimoto has done some other colorful abstractions of the cross throughout the past decade.

2. I chose this picture because, while it is not even close to being as detailed or painful as my historical choice, I think it still represents the cross well. The blue symbolism of sadness and sorrow is very meaningful. Also the dark color scheme shows the darkness and evil of the cross. Thankfully this situation was redeemed by the plan and power of God. I also like the sweeping brush strokes, because they make me think of Jesus' blood being poured out for us.

3. I think this image is true in the sense that it accurately portrays the immense sorrow and darkness of the cross, and beautifully represents the blood that Christ shed for us.

1. This image is titled "The Crucifixion" by Matthias Grünewald. It is a panel from the Isenheim alter in Colmar, Alsace (a region of France). It is from the High Renaissance period in the 16th century. This painting depicts Jesus on the cross; on the left side is Jesus' mother Mary being held by John the Apostle, along with Mary Magdalene. On the right in John the Baptist and a lamb whose blood in flowing into a communion cup. The words near John the Baptist's head translate to "He must increase, but I must decrease," a quote from the gospel of John. Grünewald was a German Renaissance painter who focused on religious images. He ignored many Renaissance rules and trends, choosing instead to continue the style of late medieval art. For example, Grünewald did not downplay the horror of the cross for the sake of an ascetically pleasing image, as evidenced especially by the gruesome position of Jesus' hands. Grünewald also ignored the Renaissance idea of making everyone/thing the same size. Instead, the figures in this painting are sized based on their importance, with Jesus being the largest.

2. I chose this image because Grünewald depicts very well the horror and torture of the cross. I feel that some paintings romanticize the cross a little too much, which diminishes its power. The cross was not romantic or pretty; it was excruciating, unbearable, gruesome. The position of Jesus' hands in this image is horrific, but conveys how awful the cross was. I also like that they look like their are in a position of total surrender. I also really like the lamb on the righthand side, whose blood is pouring into a cup. It beautifully shows the intertwinement of the cross, the sacrificial lamb, and communion.

3. This image is not "true" in the factual sense, considering that John the Baptist was already dead when Jesus was crucified. I think it is "true," however, in a theological sense because it truly shows the suffering of Christ. The others figures in the painting also help us to gain a better idea of the true character of Christ.

Isabelle's Thoughts.

I really appreciated the simplicity of this photo because it creates a sort of boldness. The layout is very effective, with the use of space to focus on the body. The use of black and white creates a spotlight on the girl that dramatizes the scene.

Looking at the girl's body, it is surprising that she would feel as if it was necessary to change. We talked about how she is very fit and I think many woman would be happy to have a body like that. The dotted lines drawn all around her stomach, neck, face and upper arms show what seems to be common places for plastic surgery. Also the fact that she is sucking in her stomach is interesting.

Her downcast face is difficult to read for me, is she determined or unsure?

The Body in 2011.

Seeing God.